Framed or unframed, desk size to sofa size, printed by us in Arizona and Alabama since 2007. Explore now.
Shorpy is funded by you. Patreon contributors get an ad-free experience.
Learn more.
"Washington Times. Interior, Hamilton Street house" circa 1920. View full size. National Photo Company Collection glass negative, Library of Congress.
I suppose the shingles of the bungalow next door are preferable to the sooty bricks of a tenement airshaft.
This is my dream kitchen! Love that in the 1920s everything was on leg so you could clean under the sink and stove.
I grew up in a New York City apartment with a very similar 1920s enamel stove. It had four gas burners over a gas oven. The lid served as a backsplash and could be folded down over the burners when not in use. (The backsplash on the stove pictured here is simply a backsplash.) It was pretty and extremely functional.
Work space was provided by a table, which doubled for family dining. A built-in floor-to-ceiling breakfront, with glass-doored shelves above and a closed cupboard of three shelves below, was sufficient storage for dishes, canned goods and appliances. There was also a hand-pulled dumbwaiter for garbage pickup and a Murphy ironing board. A huge porcelain-enameled cast-iron double sink on legs featured a porcelain drainboard cover that slid between a shallow dish sink and a very deep laundry sink. A pull-down wooden laundry rack hung over the sink. The gas refrigerator was also on short legs.
My mother turned out magnificent huge meals in this kitchen and I learned to cook in it. It was extremely efficient and easy to keep clean. One wall was breakfront, sink, and stove. The other wall accommodated the table and dumbwaiter shaft and ironing board build-out. A western window with a view from Third Avenue to the Hudson made the kitchen sunny and airy.
If I could ever build a house, the kitchen of my childhood would be the ideal, but this one is pretty similar and would fit the bill beautifully!
In my first apartment, I had a stove very much like that. The back panel doesn't move, it's just a backsplash. Which was much needed with my cooking abilities. You had to light the burners with a match, and the oven wasn't the best thing in the world and barely held anything bigger than a duck.
Note how the dish drainer is located directly over the radiator; perhaps merely serendipitous, as opposed to deliberate positioning, but the heat would hasten drying.
I may be totally off the beam here (as it seems most of my comments here are), but is it odd to anyone else that the furnace is so close to the stove? The stove alone could heat up a kitchen, but maybe a family just wouldn't run both at the same time.
I lived in a 1920's era house that was still heated by room furnaces, and the kitchen had a very small one on the opposite end of the room.
[That's a radiator for steam heat. Not a furnace. You'd heat your kitchen with a gas range or gas oven? Someone call 911. - Dave]
The Washington Post reports the sales of several "Bungalow Homes" on Hamilton Street at this time. To me, the simplicity of this kitchen suggests the modern utility associated with the Arts & Crafts bungalows, as opposed to previous stodgy Victorian designs. What I find most curious about this photo is the complete absence of ready information regarding Marlor Stoves. Neither the internet nor Washington Post archives return any relevant info. Anyone out there know any background on Marlor Stoves?
I bet it was described as "sanitary."
This lucky housewife was probably thinking how good she had it over Mama, who still pumped her water and heated it on a woodstove.
Imagine this in the kitchen setups they have at your local Home Depot or Lowes.
I believe that panel folds down to provide more counter space. Can you imagine trying to cook for a family with that setup?
looks like it folds down to cover them, a griddle perhaps, but I suspect not with that white finish.
On Shorpy:
Today’s Top 5