Framed or unframed, desk size to sofa size, printed by us in Arizona and Alabama since 2007. Explore now.
Shorpy is funded by you. Patreon contributors get an ad-free experience.
Learn more.
Circa 1915. "Field music -- 1st Regiment. Army buglers, D.C. National Guard." National Photo Company Collection glass negative. View full size.
Second from left is wearing a Model 1907 rifle cartridge belt, with revolver holster on the right side [probably a Model 1909 .45 revolver], and third from left is wearing a Model 1909 revolver cartridge belt. The remainder of the troops are wearing the enlisted men's leather garrison belt, and all troops are wearing Model 1902 khaki cotton service uniforms. It was typical of National Guard units to get older, and in some cases, obsolete, equipment and uniforms, well into the 1960s. Awesome photo showing this early 20th century gear up close and personal.
Military issue Colt .45's did have a swivel attachment. In fact when doing a small arms transfer between watches you'd transfer the lanyard to your neck before taking the weapon itself.
They'd be revolvers, most likely Smith & Wesson Model 10 .38-caliber. Clip-fed pistols don't have swivel fittings.
Not only do no two have the same belt, but no two are wearing their hats the same, either.
The tent reads "1st Infantry N.G.D.C."--this appears to stand for National Geophysical Data Center, though I've not yet established exactly when it was set up.
I guess the buglers for a bunch of Army geophysicists weren't held to as high a standard.
[NGDC = National Guard, District of Columbia. - Dave]
That makes SO much more sense!
Someday I'm going to murder the bugler
Someday they're going to find him deadI'll amputate his reveille
And step upon it heavily
And spend the rest of my life in bedAnd then I'll get that other pup
The guy who wakes the bugler up.
The two definitely are wearing sidearms. The swivels, so prominent on military pistols of the era, can clearly be seen. Remember that these guys are not regular Army but National Guard. This is not to disparage the NG, but to reflect the state or district funding that often resulted in different patterns of equipment in use concurrently.
On the far left I see a person of Asian heritage. On the far right I see a guy taking a swig, although that could be up for debate.
Sort of a sloppy outfit. Each bugler has on a different belt. One's tunic is not completely buttoned. Tassels (or whatever they are called) are placed differently on each bugle. The guy in the middle rear must be a young Smiley Burnett (only an old guy like me would know who that was) with the placement of his hat. But, all in all, a great picture.
This is why I look at Shorpy everyday. You got to love these guys. What a great picture
The equipment budget for the pre-Great War military most probably was quite small, which would explain the mishmash of belts on our lads. I see three different styles. And what's up with the soldier dead center, whose belt is slung waaay low on his right? He seems to have a holstered handgun (the butt is right above the mouthpiece of the bugle in front of him), worn backwards so he can draw it with his left hand. The only other explanation I can think of is that he's the guidon bearer and what looks like a gun holster actually is a holder for a flag staff. The guy immediately to his right (third dude from the left) appears to have a holstered weapon on his belt, but up high, military fashion.
Actually, it looks like he's drinking a beer.
On the far right we see an apprentice bugler practising on the kazoo. When he got good they let him join the band.
I think the guy on the far left ended up at MAD magazine — on the cover.
On Shorpy:
Today’s Top 5